Lots of apple sandbox violations
That prompted Lipsurf to propose that Chrome extension developers band together to get support through collective bargaining.Īpple's willingness to consider appeals of app rejections may make developers feel less powerless but a lot depends on how app rejection appeals get handled. It was only restored after the company took its complaint to social media and Google acknowledged the takedown was a mistake. The developers of Lipsurf, a Chrome voice control extension, posted last week about how their extension had been taken down for supposed policy violation. The Chrome extension developer forum, for example, is a litany of complaints about shifting hurdles, opaque decision making, and lack of communication about the code changes required for acceptance.Įmail innovator Hey extends an olive branch in standoff with Apple, tweaks code to make the iGiant appier READ MORE If Apple didn't have power over the apps available for iOS devices, it couldn't censor on behalf of authorities.ĭeveloper discontent over allegedly arbitrary and capricious enforcement of rules decreed by platform owners is not limited to the Apple ecosystem.
#Lots of apple sandbox violations software
This raises a separate but related issue: Apple, by taking on the role of gatekeeper for all software on iOS devices, has made itself vulnerable to pressure from repressive governments that have issues with particular applications. "The options are comply or be removed from the App Store." "They demanded that we remove this language around anti-censorship on the grounds that freedom of speech is severely limited in some countries," said Yen.
#Lots of apple sandbox violations update
His issue with Apple is that when ProtonMail updated the description of its iOS app in January to highlight the app's ability to "unblock censored websites," Apple rejected the update and threatened to remove the existing version of ProtonVPN which was approved back in 2018. Yen said this fee is essentially a protection racket because developers have no choice but to accept it if they want to do business on iOS. "It is hard to stay competitive if you are forced to pay your competitor 30 per cent of all of your earnings." "To be clear, this is an enormous fee and would be intolerable in normal market conditions, but it’s particularly damaging if you offer a product that competes with Apple," he wrote. Yen singled out Apple's 30 per cent fee as the most harmful expression of its power.
founder and CEO of Proton Technologies AG, a provider of secure communication services based in Switzerland, decried Apple monopoly power and accused the company of "crushing potential competitors with exploitative fees and conducting censorship on behalf of dictators." Apple to keep Intel at Arm's length: macOS shifts from x86 to homegrown common CPU arch, will run iOS apps READ MORE